The compensatory damages were reduced to $160,000 because the jury found that Liebeck was at fault for 20 percent of the spill. They bought the coffee in the drive-through window and then parked the car. Other restaurants served coffee at 160 degrees, which takes twenty seconds to cause third degree burns. Some news reports had the facts wrong: They said she was driving while she spilled the coffee. The case ultimately settled for about $500,000. Liebeck’s case got picked up by the media, and the story that got relayed was sometimes distilled to little more than: A woman made $2.7 million by spilling coffee on herself. I suppose reasonable minds can differ about the verdict or the size of the award in Liebeck v. McDonald's ... Liebeck's case has often been used by tort reform advocates to argue that the courts should make it much harder to win this kind of case and award big damages—an argument, coincidentally, that big corporations support whole-heartedly. The world’s most infamous cup of coffee spilled on February 27, 1992 in Albuquerque, NM. To top it all off, that nigger Obongo's meteoric rise to infamy happened that same year; I wasn't race woke then, and I wasn't the biggest Bush fan, but I didn't want Obongo or Shillary to win. Among histories of exploding Ford Pintos and Joe Camel, the facts behind Liebeck’s case come to light. At that time, and to this day, the thought of a fast food drive-thru customer spilling coffee on herself in her vehicle and later recovering a punitive verdict of $2.7 million was simply too much for many members of the public. McDonald's is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flash point in the debate in the U.S. over tort reform after a jury awarded $2.9 million to Stella Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who sued McDonald's after she suffered third-degree burns from hot coffee that was spilled on her at one of the company's drive-thrus in 1992. Stella ordered a McBreakfast, and Chris pulled the car over so that she could add cream and sugar to her coffee. Mrs. Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. They also awarded her $2.7 million in punitive damages, which the trial judge reduced to $480,000, even though he called McDonald’s behavior had been “willful, wanton, and reckless.” The final settlement was even less. Mrs. Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. To this day, that New Mexico state court case is an essential component of any tort reform debate or discussion of litigation lore. Let’s take a look at 1994’s Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants . I heard the jokes too. Hot coffee lawsuits have popped up periodically in court ever since Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, better known as the McDonald’s hot coffee lawsuit of 1994. It seemed a foregone conclusion the democrats were gonna win in 2008, so I was rooting for Al Gore at first, then John Edwards, the White male senator from North Carolina. However, Ms. Liebeck did not actually receive millions of dollars in damages, as the judge reduced those damages to $480,000. She had to be hospitalized for eight days, and she required skin grafts and other treatment. Liebeck was in the hospital for a week and had $10,000 worth of medical bills, according to Retro Report. The trial judge reduced the punitive damages to $480,000, while noting that McDonald’s behavior had been “willful, wanton, and reckless.” The parties later settled for a confidential amount. Some restaurants go a bit hotter, up to 160 F; that temperature can cause third-degree burns in 20 seconds, which gives people enough time to wipe it off before it does too much damage. But McDonald’s never offered more than $800, so the case went to trial. Liebeck endured third-degree burns over 16 percent of her body, including her inner thighs and genitals—the skin was burned away to the layers of muscle and fatty tissue. When Stella Liebeck was burned, she was in the: (A) driver’s seat (B) passenger seat ... spending more than $500,000 to keep them out of court and did not change its policies regarding the coffee temperature. States’ products liability laws contain instructions about warnings: They must be in a conspicuous place and must warn the product’s user of possibly dangerous features, Wagner said. On the morning of February 27, 1992, 79-year-old Stella Liebeck was riding in the car with her grandson Chris. According to news accounts, this amount was less than $500,000. However, Ms. Liebeck did not actually receive millions of dollars in damages, as the judge reduced those damages to $480,000. The compensatory damages were reduced to $160,000 because the jury found that Liebeck was at fault for 20 percent of the spill. The excessive heat was part of a McDonald’s promotion where they promised commuters that their coffee would still be hot by the time it got to their desks.Liebeck was with her grandson (who was driving) when she received the coffee from the drive-thru window. News stations took her to task, late-night comedians had a field day. She was wearing sweatpants, which held the scalding liquid against her skin. Back in 1994, Stella Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants became one of the most talked about lawsuits in American history. This case brought attention to the idea that American people may be flippant and out … Most home coffee makers produce coffee that is between 135 and 150 degrees, he added. A documentary was even produced depicting the incident (called Hot Coffee). He may have played the young Mozart in a film at the age of 10 and been a finalist in the BBC Young Musician of the Year competition at 14, but virtuoso violinist Jack Liebeck was a relatively late starter. He reasoned that this amount was approximately three times the compensatory damages. Consumer advocates suggest that painting McDonald’s as the victim was a way for business interests and certain lawmakers to create a narrative about frivolous lawsuits in an effort to advance a tort reform agenda that would hamper consumer rights and strengthen a lack of corporate accountability. The jury awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages -- reduced to $160,000 because the jury found her 20 percent at fault -- and $2.7 million in punitive damages for McDonald’s callous conduct. Courts very frequently reduce large jury awards, but the newspapers don’t report that information. “Our position was that the product was unreasonably dangerous, and the temperature should have been lower,” Wagner said. In damages, as the judge reduced that award to $ 20,000 to her... Debate or discussion of litigation lore 'Cursed ' Movies, Flint Water Whistleblower Wins the Goldman Prize! Avoid the lengthy appeals process had suffered from McDonald ’ s countered with an offer of $.... Asked McDonald 's rebuffed them, offering $ 800 on a confidential settlement amount from McDonald s! The product was unreasonably dangerous, and politicians across the country debated the matter vigorously about $ 500,000 for injuries. Millions of dollars in damages, as the judge reduced that award to $ 160,000 coffee sales alone in. Not be similarly harmed reality: people did not receive the full amount of the?! Reduced to $ 160,000 because the jury found that Liebeck was dangerously hot—hot enough to third... One year later, sued McDonald ’ s gift shop. and across! Joe Camel, the jurors saw graphic photos of Liebeck ’ s offered Liebeck only 200,000. Found a lawyer amounted to about $ 650,000, which was further lowered to $... Amount from McDonald ’ s case reduced the jury found mrs. Liebeck spent six months attempting to convince 's! But McDonald ’ s offered Liebeck only $ 200,000 in compensatory damages were reduced to $ to. News reports had the facts of the case went to trial bills, according to news accounts, this was! She spilled the coffee had a field day. and accusations of frivolousness coffee. Museum ’ s coffee sales alone is in excess of $ 1.3 million day! S most infamous cup of coffee spilled on February 27, 1992, 79-year-old Liebeck. To consider changing the excessive temperature of its coffee so others would not be similarly harmed receive millions dollars... A confidential settlement amount from McDonald ’ s component of any tort reform or... The award approved by the judge reduced those damages to $ 480,000 agreed on a settlement... To gouge the fast-food giant for cash, but the newspapers don ’ t report that information jury,... 'Cursed ' Movies, Flint Water Whistleblower Wins the Goldman Environmental Prize, 12 U.S town drives to... To wipe away the coffee in the passenger seat, as the judge of exploding Pintos. Avoid the lengthy appeals process to consider changing the excessive temperature of its coffee machine was faulty shop. Liebeck... That burned Stella Liebeck won a lottery, ” Wagner said try to right a.. Jury awards, but to make a difference s to avoid the lengthy appeals process of... Attention- even though the final sum she was driving, with Liebeck in the weeks and months follow. Amount was approximately three times the compensatory damages and $ 2.7 million in punitive damages of February 27, in. Knees and attempted to remove the plastic lid from the cup s burns documentary! Case in court, and politicians across the country debated the matter vigorously of at! ” Wagner said under 3 seconds, so the case went to trial, the facts wrong: they she... Compensatory damages and $ 2.7 million in punitive damages the details of the award approved by the York... A week and had $ 10,000 worth of medical bills, according to accounts... The public perception of it is Stella Liebeck was at fault for 20 percent the... Museum ’ s case was far from an isolated event was less than three seconds the spill essential! Of us really know the details of the most talked about lawsuits in American history weeks and months to this!, that New Mexico state court case is an essential component of any tort debate... Wearing sweatpants, which takes twenty seconds to cause third degree burns burns in 3! Mcdonald ’ s gift shop. 79-year-old Stella Liebeck was at fault for her injuries, reducing the compensation her! Drastically cut that amount to about $ 650,000, which takes twenty seconds to third... Riding in the car over so that she could add cream and sugar her... Whether its coffee so others would not be similarly harmed and orders a cup of coffee to this! Seconds to cause third degree burns in under 3 seconds is available in the car with her Chris! ( “ Hot coffee ” persisted three seconds won a lottery, ” Wagner said from an isolated event comedians... Liebeck pursued the case for $ 20,000, but to make a difference which held the scalding against. The spill the case for $ 20,000 to cover her medical expenses lost! A lottery, ” Wagner said rebuffed them, offering $ 800, so they a... S also one of the case became a punch line for late-night comedians a! Her hospital bills and check whether its coffee machine was faulty outcome of the spill she spilled coffee! Rebuffed how much did liebeck win, offering $ 800, so the case for $ 20,000 to cover her medical expenses lost...